Really good, detailed backgrounds here, and I enjoyed the artifact designs, particularly the green incense burner. Good colours too, everything is pretty vibrant and pleasant to look at. I haven’t seen much of Yvonne before, but her design is creative and I like how her horns and arms change shape to enhance the scene. I didn’t catch it the first time, but on a reread I saw them forming arrows and question marks and I thought that was fun. Also liked how Tyidid’s head acted as an “O” and completed the word “BONK” in the second comic.

I didn’t find the writing in these great though. Things happened kind of abruptly and randomly, and in both comics, things were set up that had muddled or no proper resolutions. For example, in the first comic, Yvonne is screeching at Tyidid to leave, but then follows him and immediately puts this unknown object in her mouth? And then is perfectly okay with giving away the artifacts she so vehemently defended for free? Meanwhile in the second, Yvonne tries to steal this artifact, there’s a conflict, then she just... doesn’t want it anymore and leaves. She also switches from “I want the thing” to “I want to beat you up” really suddenly, but then doesn’t even do that? “I want the object. Oh actually I don’t, I wanna beat you up. But actually I don’t wanna do that either, I’m just gonna leave. The end.” - this is how her thought process comes off.

As for what I mean by muddled... I’m guessing in the first comic, the joke was that Tyidid had seemingly no bad luck despite touching the cursed item, and then right at the end it suddenly comes back. That’s a good idea, but for me the joke didn’t hit because by tripping on a stone and falling, he was already experiencing an action that could’ve broken his legs, before he even touched the cursed teapot. It also has little buildup, with all the action post-trip crammed into a single panel. Yes, we as an audience can infer that he tripped, dropped the teapot, then caught it, which is why his legs are broken. However, if you’re telling a visual joke in a visual medium, you do kinda need to spell things out, because the condensed version here ruins the timing of the joke. What might’ve made it clearer and possibly funnier would be a few more panels in between the trip and the fall. Have him trip - not fall to the ground, just stumble - but being off balance, he drops the teapot and goes to catch it. You see him catch it, while still upright. And THEN in the final panel, his legs break, and he just crumples to the ground.

Also...

“"cro cro cro why is no one consistently holding anything between panels"
in all cases they are either putting things into their inventory or juggling them into the air with a dexterous hand. honestly, these sorts of occurrences are so commonplace in comics that you shouldn't need me to explicitly depict them juggling and/or interacting with a metatextual storage universe.”

...

Dude, I don’t think this attitude is helpful. First of all, in a comic where a specific item being touched or snatched is integral to the plots of both comics, I really don’t think you can use that excuse. Second of all, just cos something is commonplace doesn’t mean it’s good? Loads of comics have bad anatomy, I’m not gonna intentionally draw poorly bc it’s just a Thing in comics. And third, just, can you stop for a second and really think about what you’re doing? I see you consistently admit to errors in your comics, only to turn around and go actually, they’re not errors, they were done on purpose and it’s just meta stuff that should be obvious. You imply it’s the reader’s fault for not getting it, then you double down and repeat those errors. Why ask for critique at all if your comics apparently have no issues, and are clearly just too meta and advanced for the rest of us to understand?