Critique of Leon (by Reef)
Psychology:
Moral standards: Based on loyalties. Will stand next to them wether it's right or wrong.
The description's a bit vague, but from this can I assume this man is bound by oath and service? It's not a bad thing at all, but it seems like he has no morals of his own when you put it this way.
Time period: (Not quite sure how to answer this one. It is very confusing to me.)
I probably should elaborate on this one more. Time Period Psychology refers to how the times affect the way people think and act. People in the 16th century think the same way people think now, and people 50 years from now won't think the same way we do now. I guess it's a bit hard to pinpoint in Void City's pseudo-modernistic setting, but sometimes it can be useful in finding what makes a character different (or similar) to the society he is in.
Yes, i think i do have to rephrase the moral standards. I should say that he will do what he belives to be the right thing. And that even if a friend decides to do what he may consider to be wrong, he will help in every way possible. He will disagree with that point of view and feel discomfort in having to help out, but it's his way of being. So his loyalties are stronger than his own convictions, but it isn't that he has none.
It also seems i was not the only one with doubts about that last one. But i think i understand now. An example would be something like a person living in the year 20xx while behaving like it was feudal japan (to give a radical example). If that's the case, then Leon would have to be modern as well.